RSS Feed

Posts Tagged ‘rant’

  1. Three Wise Men

    December 8, 2004 by dafyd

    Celebrity Nativity at Madame TussaudsA BBC News article caught my eye:

    Victoria and David Beckham’s wax doubles have been given starring roles in a celebrity nativity scene at Madame Tussauds in London.

    The pair play Mary and Joseph, while Tony Blair, George Bush and the Duke of Edinburgh make up the three wise men.

    Actors Hugh Grant, Samuel L Jackson and comedian Graham Norton play shepherds and singer Kylie Minogue is the angel.

    Sorry… but Tony Blair, George W Bush and the Duke of Edinburgh as the three wise men? Now, let’s see – some of their bons mots:

    “Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.”

    Hmm, I wonder which imbecile with the world’s largest nuclear stockpile said that.

    “What you can say is that we received that intelligence about Saddam’s programmes and about his weapons, that we acted on that.”

    Yeah, great move, that one, Mr Blair.

    While visiting the formerly British-occupied territory of Scotland, Prince Phillip asked a driving instructor:

    “How do you keep the natives off the booze long enough to get them through the test?”

    (Hang on, I just read that having copied it from the BBC. Formerly British-occupied territory? Scotland? Huh?)


  2. BBC News dumbing down?

    November 30, 2004 by dafyd

    You have to wonder when this is headline news on BBC News

    (Click to view screenshot)


  3. David Blunkett – the end is nigh?

    November 28, 2004 by dafyd

    David BlunkettI’ve not blogged about the whole David Blunkett affair thing yet, because I believe quitevery strongly that his personal life is exactly that – not something for everyone to pick through as they feel like it.

    But over the last few days, as more and more allegations of impropriety emerged, I started to wonder whether his personal life had started to leak into his public one.

    To quote the Sunday Telegraph (much as I’d rather not…):

    The Home Secretary allegedly used his position to facilitate the granting of permanent residency for Leoncia “Luz” Casalme, a 36-year-old nanny working for Kimberly Quinn, the married woman with whom he had a secret three-year affair.

    [...]

    It is the allegations that he used his powers as Home Secretary to do favours for his mistress, however, that will cause a political storm. Our investigation can reveal that, in addition to his help for the nanny, the Home Secretary allegedly:

    · Shared confidential security information with Mrs Quinn, in what a friend of hers described as “pillow talk”. This included advice to her parents to avoid Newark airport, in New York, hours before a security scare and giving Mrs Quinn advance knowledge of police raids in Manchester that led to the death of an officer in January, 2003;

    · Ordered a policeman to stand outside Mrs Quinn’s Mayfair home to safeguard her against anti-capitalist rioting that had been expected during a May Day demonstration;

    · Gave her first-class rail tickets in August 2002 which are thought to have been assigned to him for his work as an MP;

    · Put pressure on the American embassy to issue a temporary passport for William Quinn in May 2003, so that Mrs Quinn and her son could join him on holiday in France;

    · Used his government chauffeur to drive Mrs Quinn to his home in Derbyshire for weekend trysts;

    · Took Mrs Quinn, the publisher of The Spectator, to Spain for a wedding, accompanied by four security men and a driver, with much of the cost allegedly met by the taxpayer.

    Of course, when the story about his affair with Ms Quinn/Fortier broke, he flew the Home Office Press Officer out to France (I think), to discuss tactics of response there. If that isn’t an abuse of ministerial privilege, I don’t know what is.

    As I’ve said, I don’t really care if he did or didn’t have an affair, nor do I care about the results of the paternity tests he’s trying to get. Most of the accusations levelled by the Torygraph above are fairly petty – but if the serious ones are true, he should seriously reconsider his position. In fact, he should be made to reconsider his position by the PM.

    An interesting parallel is that with Boris Johnson’s alleged affair with Petronella Wyatt – Wibbler has linked to a couple of articles on it over at Boriswatch.


  4. Bring Back Boris

    November 14, 2004 by dafyd

    Sign the petition to “Bring Back Boris” at http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/boris.

    If enough people sign it, we can send it off to Mr Howard and see what sort of reaction we get…

    Bring Back Boris!


  5. Nooooooooooooooooo… The Return

    November 13, 2004 by dafyd

    How thick can Michael Howard get? According to BBC News:

    Boris

    Boris Johnson has been sacked as Tory shadow arts minister amid allegations about his private life, a spokesman for party leader Michael Howard has said. The spokesman said Mr Johnson was sacked for lying about the claims, not because of the claims themselves. Mr Howard sacked Mr Johnson by telephone on Saturday afternoon. The Henley MP, who edits the Spectator magazine and is married with four children, has also been sacked from his post of party vice-chairman. Mr Johnson last week dismissed reports in a Sunday newspaper that he had an affair with Spectator columnist Petronella Wyatt. He called the allegations “an inverted pyramid of piffle”. There are understood to be fresh revelations in at least two Sunday newspapers this week.

    How stupid can the Tories get? Do they really not realise that Boris is the world’s most popular Conservative? And does this seem a little strange to anyone else? Like possibly that these allegations have been used as an excuse to get rid of Boris because of other reasons – like the chat show Boris image and the Liverpool/Bigley article in the Spectator.

    I have no doubt that he’ll be back soon. Either that, or he’ll retire from politics completely and concentrate on his “other projects” (as actors say). In fact, I’d say that the second would be better for him… he has more freedom in terms of his own views (à la Liverpool), which means we get more Boris and less Howard. Just so long as he doesn’t join UKIP, I’ll be happy!

    Keep up with the discussion at Boriswatch

    Update: I just wanted to post here something that I wrote on Boriswatch:

    The back-stabbing that has been around in the Conservative party since 1990 really caused this – Michael Howard, having himself succesfully challenged for the leadership of the party, started to get worried about Boris’ popularity. So he sacked him. Great move. Now Boris will go down in the eyes of Daily Mail readers (the ones who didn’t like him anyway), and go up in the eyes of the Sun and so on – those who normally wouldn’t care. As I’ve said several times this evening, I doubt very much that Boris will stay down for long, and when he does he will have more support than ever before. (Hmm… Star Wars – “If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine”)

    Boris – we need you back!


  6. Foiled again!

    November 7, 2004 by dafyd

    You remember my prediction about the aftermath of the US election? No? Let me jog your memory:

    I hate to say it, but I would really not like to live in any of the big American cities at the moment. I just get a really bad feeling that there could be some sort of strike-back from our Middle Eastern friends…

    Well… surprise, surprise, it looks like I’ve been proven wrong almost immediately! According to my Muppet-ometer on the left right (I’m tired, ok), the threat level is at Bert… whereas before it was at Ernie (one higher) in New York and Washington DC. Oh well. I suppose it’s lucky I’m not an intelligence analyst for the CIA!

    Terror Alert Level


  7. Trains

    November 6, 2004 by dafyd

    I know it sounds selfish, but why is it that whenever I choose to travel any considerable distance by train there is always some problem somewhere? For example, a 1-and-a-half hour journey took 4 hours yesterday. To be fair, I’m sure that the companies involved did all they could to make it go faster and easier… but why does it always happen when I’m travelling?


  8. Why am I not surprised?

    October 13, 2004 by dafyd

    Of course – the (alleged) plot to overthrow the government of Equatorial Guinea was organised by none other than our very own Lord Archer, according to The Guardian:

    Jeffrey Archer

    New evidence has emerged linking Jeffrey Archer to the alleged conspirators behind the attempted coup in Equatorial Guinea. A lawyer for the Equatorial Guinea government said in London yesterday that telephone records showed four calls between the homes of one of the alleged financiers behind the plot, London-based Lebanese businessman Ely Calil, and Lord Archer in the run-up to the coup attempt in March. Another alleged plotter, businessman Greg Wales, also made five calls to Sir Mark Thatcher in the days after the failed coup. Solicitor Henry Page said: “The calls … provide substantial links between the conspirators around the time of the coup attempt.” Last night Lord Archer responded to a report about the telephone calls in the London Evening Standard. His lawyer released a statement on behalf of the peer, who was jailed for perjury and perverting the course of justice in 2001.

    No doubt he’ll wriggle out of it, but within a couple of years I’m sure we will find that he was, in fact, behind the assasination of JFK, Bobby Kennedy, Gandhi, John Lennon and Princess Di, he single-handedly faked the moon landings, and was responsible for the fiasco of the Millennium Dome. Let’s face it, we need a scapegoat for everything that goes wrong, and he always seems to turn up in the right places at the right time…


  9. Jacques Villeneuve

    September 26, 2004 by dafyd

    From BBC News:

    Doesn't he look happy..?

    Jacques Villeneuve said he was not quick enough after finishing 11th in the Chinese Grand Prix on his Formula One return after a year away. The 1997 world champion, driving for Renault in the last three races of the year, said: “I just needed too long to get into the rhythm of the race. “I made a good start but hadn’t warmed up the tyres enough and lost a lot of the positions I had made up. “But I learned a lot and now feel ready for the next race at Suzuka.” Villeneuve was a long way off the pace of team-mate Fernando Alonso, who finished fourth behind Rubens Barrichello, Jenson Button and Kimi Raikkonen. The Canadian had had only minimal experience of Renault’s car before the race. He held off numerous attacks from Michael Schumacher during the race, but at one point the team told him on the radio to speed up.

    Oh diddums. I feel so sorry for him. Poor little man, sacked at the end of last year because he was rubbish – surprise, surprise, he’s still rubbish!

    Just a reminder though (JJ…) – NOBODY CARES!


  10. TATU Producer Angers Russia With Suicide Bomber Singer

    September 11, 2004 by dafyd

    This article from Russian News Agency MosNews seems quite relevant today:

    Russians, still in shock at the Beslan tragedy, have reacted angrily to a music producer’s plans for what he calls a “terror concert”, with a female singer dressed as a suicide bomber on the anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks. The singer, called n.A.T.o. in a spin-off of the “lesbian schoolgirl” t.A.T.u. duo that took the West by storm, wears a long black dress, a veil, and sings in Arabic. Producer Ivan Shapovalov, who launched both groups, does not deny that the resemblance to a suicide bomber is intentional. Tickets to Saturday’s show have also been made to look like plane tickets. “Shapovalov is exploiting the topical theme of terrorism … The tragedy in Beslan did little to stop his creative drive,” the Izvestia daily wrote. Shapovalov, meanwhile, does not rule out that there may be problems holding the concert. “Because everyone’s so scared…I feel some doubts on their part,” he told MosNews, speaking of the organizers. The concert will feature the latest news footage from the Middle East, and references to al Qaeda and Iraq. An official from the Ministry of Culture also spoke out against holding the event. “The coming concert is absolutely politically incorrect in form,” Interfax quoted the official as saying. He added that while he has indicated this to Shapovalov’s representatives, the Ministry of Culture does not have any legal means of canceling the concert. “This is sick. That man is sick. The producer should be jailed for doing that after so many people died across Russia in the past weeks,” Reuters quoted a Muscovite as saying. “I am sure the concert will be cancelled.” But while he admits that his protegee is supposed to look like a suicide bomber, Shapovalov doesn’t see why people are upset. “If people are scared by a woman wearing a black headscarf, that means they are sick themselves,” Izvestia quoted him as saying. When MosNews asked him about his use of terror imagery in his ad campaign for n.A.T.o., he says, “I’m not leading a campaign. I like her songs and I like it when others listen to things I like.” Meanwhile, a member of Shapovalov’s creative team, who chose to remain anonymous, told MosNews the producer has already discussed n.A.T.o. with a London music company and that the company is interested, “because nothing is getting blown up in England”.

    Frankly, I’m shocked. Surely this producer, a Russian version of Simon Cowell, can’t be so out-of-touch with his country’s feelings (and, in fact, the world’s)… if the tragedy in Beslan caused the BBC, half the world away, to cancel programmes, surely this guy must realise that he can’t possibly carry on with the concert.