RSS Feed

July, 2007

  1. Harry and Me

    July 29, 2007 by dafyd

    Detail of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone front cover In the summer of 1997, when we were shopping in Dillon’s in Nottingham, my mum pointed out a book she had heard reviewed on Radio 4 and thought I might enjoy. We bought it. That book was Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone.

    I started at Nottingham High School two weeks later, and got round to reading the book sometime that term. I couldn’t put it down. The idea that this boy, nine days older than me*, was suddenly whisked away to a secret school for wizards was utterly enchanting to me. I had just started at the High School, a 500-year old institution with arcane traditions, strange rules and (to an 11-year old) imposingly grand buildings where I knew no one and which was about as different as you could get to my primary school, and, while I couldn’t exactly relate to the magic element, I knew exactly how alone Harry felt when he first arrived at Hogwarts.

    I didn’t read book two, the Chamber of Secrets, when it was first released. I don’t know why – I guess I missed it: Potter-mania was still practically non-existent back then – the first book had not been published in the US, the film rights had not been sold, “muggle” was not in the OED, there were no midnight launches. I eventually borrowed it from David, I think. Book three, the Prisoner of Azkaban, was released on the last day of my second year of school, when we finished at lunchtime, and David and I walked down to Waterstone’s to buy it that afternoon. Harry’s published school years coincided exactly with my own, and it seemed almost as though he was growing up at the same time as I was (although I didn’t have the transfiguration classes, evil dark wizards or house-elves).

    The next four books were released at two-year intervals, so that link was slightly lost, but there was still some connection present. Harry and I developed together. When a new book was released, I rushed to buy it, not because of any hype**, but rather as if to find news from an old friend.

    My Harry does not look like Daniel Radcliffe. My Hogwarts is more Durham than Alnwick, more Nottingham High School than Oxford. My Ministry of Magic does not resemble an underground station. The potions master is more like… well, I’m not going to say. But you get my point. I transferred into Harry’s wondrous world the people, the places, the things that I knew and loved or hated. Which is, I would argue with anyone, exactly the point of fiction, and especially of the type of fiction that Rowling writes.

    And now, whether or not Harry is dead (I’m not going to spoil any endings for people who haven’t read book seven yet – there are plenty of other places for that), it is clear that we are not going to hear any more from his world. His story has come, quite definitively, to a close. It feels almost like moving away from somewhere and knowing that you’ll never speak with an old friend again.

    If this reads like sentimental twaddle about a fictional character, then yes, I suppose it is. Harry is not real. I have no problem with that. I’m not one of those “fans” who obsess over every single detail of the books, or who ‘ship certain relationships. I am well aware that there is no Hogwarts, no Ministry of Magic, no hippogriffs. But the joy of Rowling’s writing, whatever its flaws, was that she created a world that was so believable, characters that were so engaging, experiences that were so, well, real, that as an 11-year old, I had no problem imagining that they could exist. And I have stayed there for 10 years, happy to suspend my disbelief and follow the escapades of someone who grew up with me, someone who encountered things that I could only dream of, someone who, outside of his adventures, faced the same day-to-day joys and troubles that I did, someone to whom I could relate in those times when, perhaps, I had trouble getting close to people in the real world, someone with whom I could escape to another time and place when I really needed to get away from this one.

    And now, I know that I won’t hear from him and his other friends again. And I’ll miss them. But it was fun.

    *Yes, pedant, I know Harry was born in 1980. But he first came to life, just before his 11th birthday, in 1997. And that’s how I know him.
    **The only book I ever bought based on hype was the Da Vinci Code. I wish I hadn’t. It eats at your soul and messes with your mind, rather like a tapeworm does with your digestive system. Damn you, Dan Brown.


  2. Dafyd’s Handy Cooking Tip

    July 18, 2007 by dafyd

    You know those bags of rice what they advertise on the telly from that nice Mr Uncle Ben? The ones that you stick in the microwave for a couple of minutes and when you take them out you have a whole meal ready for you?

    Well, you know how it says on the packet to make an inch-long tear along the top of the bag? And how you should do that before putting the bag in the microwave?

    They aren’t joking. (Oh, look, no question mark there.) If, by some strange quirk of fate or lapse in concentration your bag of rice lacks the aforementioned tear, it explodes. Inside the microwave. Showering the microwave with half-cooked rice.

    Here endeth the public service announcement.


  3. Enchanted

    July 15, 2007 by dafyd

    They showed a trailer for Disney’s big Christmas film, Enchanted, before Harry Potter yesterday. I’m actually rather looking forward to this…

    You need the free Macromedia Flash Player to watch this video. Download it here.

    If you’re reading this in a feedreader, or in Facebook or the like, you’ll have to click through to the actual post. Make sure you do, though – it’s totally worth it.

    Incidentally, the cinema here in Sainte-Adèle shows three trailers before its films, and no adverts. Which is a refreshing change.


  4. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

    July 15, 2007 by dafyd

    Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix poster

    Here begins seven days of Potter madness.

    It was always going to be difficult to adapt Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. The longest Potter book, it contains a remarkable amount of waffle and prevaricating, and a not inconsiderable heaping of emoting for most of the main characters. There are also some fairly big ideas – state censorship, torture, and, of course, the battle of good versus evil.

    And this is director David Yates’ first proper film. He was the chappy responsible for the awesome State of Play BBC mini-series a couple of years ago, and he directed Richard Curtis’ G8 policy directive The Girl in the Café in 2005. So he can certainly do character pieces. But what about this massive, effects laden, $200 million juggernaut?

    I’d say he succeeded. Yates and new screenwriter Michael Goldenberg (regular screenwriter Steve Kloves is busy doing The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time) seem to have cut most of the cruft from Rowling’s 750-page novel, without really leaving out any of the plot. Sure, certain devices have been amalgamated, changed or reduced in importance, but the essence – and much of the fact – of the book is still present.

    There are some fantastic scenes that really do show Yates’ devotion to the characters’ development – the Weasley family has some terribly nice moments together, and the main trio have some charming little encounters. Yates has, apparently, been called an “actor’s director”, in that he plays very much to the strengths of his cast and coaxes performances of a very high standard out of them. This is certainly true of Daniel Radcliffe: his acting reaches a new high, here. He was terrific in Equus in London in the spring, and I daresay that much of his performance there came from his development on this Potter film.

    Imelda Staunton joins the franchise as Dolores Umbridge, the thoroughly nasty Under-Minister who becomes Hogwarts High Inquisitor. She perfectly depicts the autocratic evil of the character, and her pink clothes, cat plates and tea add to the strange shift between her exterior English aunt appearance and her interior malignancy.

    David Bradley (Filch) gets his most screentime yet, acting, perfectly, almost as a comic foil to Umbridge. Robert Hardy and Jason Isaacs have been criminally underused in the previous films and really do get to show off their talents here. Alan Rickman’s Snape is so on-the-nose that it’s scary (his “Evidently”, in this film, is probably the definitive Snape moment, and comes close to Rickman’s previous best). Michael Gambon seems to draw on all his Pinter experience for his Dumbledore, with much moody silence. And Maggie Smith’s McGonagall is still a magical Miss Jean Brodie, but this time with more anger.

    Both Emma Watson and Rupert Grint do fantastic work in their supporting roles. Grint, especially, seems to have made the transition from comedy sidekick to trusted best friend very well.

    Yates is, apparently, set to direct film six (the Half-Blood Prince) and he’s added a fair amount to this film to build on next time. Ginny Weasley’s relationship with Harry, for example, is just a few quick looks here, but next film will become much more important.

    I do have a few complaints, mainly to do with the way the film was put together. It seemed very, very choppy – some cuts coming almost in the middle of a scene – . Also, whose idea was it to change the dementors? When they appeared in Prisoner of Azkaban, they were damn scary. In this film, they looked too much like reanimated, flying mummies (the Egyptian kind).

    This is certainly a fine adaptation of the novel, and also an interesting reinvention of the previous films in the series. We see new elements from the new director, screenwriter and composer (Nicholas Hooper’s score, incidentally, is fantastic. He takes just enough of John Williams and Patrick Doyle’s works, and fleshes them out into his whole new work. Terrific.) added to the world and characters we already know. The result is fairly spectacular.

    Now roll on next Saturday morning. I want to know how it all ends…


  5. Tintin in the Congo

    July 14, 2007 by dafyd

    BBC News is reporting that the UK’s Commission for Racial Equality is “calling on high street book[stores] to pull a Tintin adventure from its shelves over claims it is racist.”

    Yes, it contains “bourgeois, paternalistic stereotypes of the period – an interpretation some readers may find offensive” (in the words of the Tintin‘s UK publisher, Egmont). But surely that’s a reason to keep selling it? The stereotypes are so ridiculous that no one could possibly take them seriously. We studied the text in one of our French modules last year, for exactly this reason. It tells us exactly what the Belgian attitude to their colonies was in the early 20th century. No one’s suggesting we ban Othello because of it’s stereotypical representation of moors, are they? (It’s probably next, actually.) Are Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales anti-Christian? Ban ‘em.

    The Gollywogs have been removed from Noddy. The new Famous 5 adventures showed Julian doing the washing up and Anne and George having adventures. Now, I don’t want to get on the PC-gone-crazy bandwagon (because I loathe those people, with a passion), but this is stupid. Literature – even (I’d say especially) children’s books – is an artefact of it’s time. We need to embrace the quirky stereotypes found within and educate children as to why they are wrong. Removing them altogether just prompts future generations to invent their own.

    In the (somewhat bastardised) words of Voltaire, “I absolutely disagree with what you say, but I’ll defend to the death your right to say it.”

    Incidentally, number five on Amazon.co.uk’s best-selling books chart right now? Tintin in the Congo, probably Tintin’s first appearance on Amazon’s chart. It’s right behind Potter and Campbell, and just in front of Richard Dawkins. There’s a joke there somewhere, but I can’t find it.


  6. Banque

    July 13, 2007 by dafyd

    Last Thursday, I was paid for my first couple of weeks work at Enzyme. But no social insurance number = no bank account = nowhere to bank a cheque. Sigh.

    On Friday I finally got a social insurance number (this involved a rather enjoyable couple of hours out of work, so that was fun). But… both of the banks in Sainte-Adèle close at 4pm on Fridays (and, in fact, every other day of the week but Thursdays). They’re not open at all on Saturdays and Sundays. Crazy.

    So today was the first chance I had to open a bank account. I stopped in at the Caisse Populaire (what we in the UK would call a Mutual, were there any left) and asked to open an account. The nice young lady on reception smiled, apologised, and said she had no appointments available before July 25th. Pfah. I want my money now.

    On to the Banque Nationale, then. The receptionist there smiled, apologised, and said it would be impossible to see me before 5 o’clock. This was at 4.45. Guess with whom I opened an account…

    Here, you have to pay for absolutely every service at the bank. It’s a bit strange – $1 to deposit a cheque, and so on. The bank does “packages”, where you get a certain number of transactions and whatnot for a set monthly fee. Coming from somewhere where any attempt by banks to charge you for your own money makes newspaper headlines, it takes some getting used to…


  7. 12 days of Potter

    July 9, 2007 by dafyd

    So, there are just over twelve days (or just under, depending on where you are in the world) to go before Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is released worldwide.

    I reserved my copy yesterday at Chapters in Montreal. While UK booksellers are battling it out over who can make the biggest loss selling Potter (Amazon and Waterstone’s are both selling it for £8.99 – less than half price – as I assume are WHS and Borders), I had to pay C$34.34 for my Canadian reservation. That’s just under £17. Pfah. That’s still C$11 off the publisher’s price, but still… I notice the Chapters website lists it for C$23.04, so maybe I’ll get money back when I buy it, or something.

    Now, Chapters in Montreal will be open at midnight on the 21st, and I’ll be hanging around in Montreal waiting for a flight to Washington D. C., so I may very well be tempted to pick mine up then. I’m still mildly gutted that I’m not working at Waterstone’s for the release, since we had such a blast the last time, so this might make up for it a bit. Anyway, we’ll see.

    While waiting for Book 7, of course, we can pass the time with Film 5. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is released here (and most other places) on Wednesday. No doubt the cinema in town will be showing it. I’m trying to hunt down the nearest IMAX (there must be one in Montreal), as, apparently, the last half hour or so is being shown in IMAX 3D, which, knowing how the scene reads, ought to be pretty spectacular.

    So, Harry Potter fortnight is finally upon us. A quick warning for those of you in the UK who’ll get hold of Book 7 a full five hours before I do (because, David, that’s how time zones work)… Don’t You Dare Spoil It For Me.


  8. The Lord of the Rings

    July 8, 2007 by dafyd

    I was catching up on my podcasts on the bus to Montreal yesterday, including MusicalTalk (“the UK’s only independent musical theatre podcast”), which included a review of The Lord of the Rings.

    Lord of the RingsAs it appears I never actually finished my review of the show when I saw it in May, I suggest you listen to this. It’s pretty much exactly what I thought of it.

    In summary, for those who can’t be bothered to listen: Gollum: excellent. Staging, tech, lighting: best ever, worth every penny. Accents: huh? Laura Michelle Kelly (aka Olivier-winning Mary Poppins): wasted in her part. Acting generally: too modern dance-like. Music: not really a musical – more a spectacle with music.

    Anyway, yes, I heartily recommend The Lord of the Rings (whether or not it’s a musical) – it’s truly bigger as a show than anything else. And MusicalTalk‘s quite entertaining, especially when it features the awesomely awesome Martin Ball and the über-talented Emma Williams.

    [Image (clicky for bigger): Galadriel (Laura Michelle Kelly) at Lothlorien]


  9. Mistranslation du jour

    July 8, 2007 by dafyd

    I spotted this at Montreal’s central bus station yesterday:

    Screenshot of a Montreal bus timetable screen

    [Clicky for bigger at Flickr]

    Those crazy Canadians took the word “guichet”, which can mean both “ticket window” and “wicket”, and picked the wrong translation.

    Well, I found it funny, anyway.

    [More of my Montreal photos at Flickr]


  10. Something good

    July 4, 2007 by dafyd

    Alan Johnston freed - image from CNNFinally, some good news from the Middle East:

    The BBC is reporting that Alan Johnston, its Gaza correspondent who was taken hostage nearly four months ago, has been released to the Hamas government. He is, apparently, tired but in good health.

    I think it’s fair to say that this must be a huge relief to Mr Johnston, his family, friends and colleagues, and to the millions of people around the world who have campaigned for his release. I look forward to seeing him back at work soon…

    I’ve blogged before about how important I consider it to be that journalists are allowed to carry out their work unencumbered, wherever they are in the world. This shows that the Palestinian authorities, whatever their other problems, also believe in that crucial concept. Thank goodness.

    [Image via CNN]