RSS Feed

January, 2006

  1. Castle 2 – Other Colleges 0

    January 29, 2006 by dafyd

    It’s time again for the Intercollegiate Challenge, a University Challenge-style quiz competition between the Durham colleges, nominally to find the best college, but really to pick the DU team for said TV quiz show.

    Last week, in the first round, the Castle team, featuring yours truly, squarely biffed Collingwood (ha, housemates – take that) in a not-terribly-gripping game – more of a walkover, really.

    Tonight, in the quarter finals, we beat St John’s, albeit by a slightly smaller margin.

    Woo.

    Watch this space for news of the semi-finals and final next week…


  2. Who’s listening at 5.30am anyway?

    January 27, 2006 by dafyd

    Tsk. The Controller (I’m not sure if that should be capitalised, but it is anyway) of Radio 4 has decreed that the UK Theme will no longer be played when the service starts at 5.30 (well, from April, anyway).

    In the words of the inimitable Paxo on Newsnight:

    But we leave you with the sad news … the BBC UK theme played on Radio 4 is to be scrapped. It’s been good enough for the past 33 years, but if you tune in, as they say in radioland, at half past five in the morning you will hear instead what’s been described as a ‘pacy news briefing’ so enjoy it while you can. We’ve no idea what the head of Radio 4′s playing at – we’re thinking of using it every night. Goodnight.

    Surprise, surprise, those listeners who know how to use the web are making sure that he knows that they are not happy.

    Early Day Motions have been tabled in the House of Commons, and it was even raised at Prime Minister’s Question Time. Rather disturbingly, Blunko mentioned it in his Sun column – although Sun readers and Radio 4 listeners are, I’d suggest, rather like chalk and cheese.

    There is, of course, a website dedicated to “Saving the Radio 4 Theme“…

    What is Mr Damazer (for that is the Fat Controller’s name) playing at? Losing the goodwill of a large, militant – well, I think militant is a bit of an understatement… this is the WI brigade we’re talking about, remember – proportion of his core listeners… for a couple of minutes at half five in the morning. Why? What’s the point? If he wants more time, he can always get rid of Quote, Unquote and bunch everything up there…

    Save the Radio 4 UK Theme


  3. 4 things

    January 26, 2006 by dafyd

    Gah. Tagged by Rob. Here goes…

    Four jobs I’ve had in my life

    • Bookseller, Waterstone’s Nottingham (actually, I’ve technically been employed by them four different times. Does that count as four jobs?)
    • After-School Librarian, Nottingham High School
    • Freelance Web Designer
    • Umm… now I’m kinda stuck…

    Four movies I can watch over and over

    • 10 Things I Hate About You (guilty pleasure)
    • I.Q.
    • The Indiana Jones trilogy
    • Toy Story 2

    Four places I have lived

    • Nottingham
    • Durham
    • That’s it. Sorry. Come back in a year, and I can add Alexandria and Québec to this list…

    Four TV shows I love to watch

    • The West Wing
    • Scrubs
    • House
    • Spooks

    Four places I have been on holiday

    • Paris (gasp!)
    • Krakow
    • Washington DC (My geographer housemate knowledgably informs me that DC stands for Da Capital. Scarily, I think he means it.)
    • Québec

    Four of my favourite dishes

    • Boudain Blanc
    • Proper roast dinner (with yorkshires and all the trimmings)
    • Smoked Salmon on little blinis
    • New York Vanilla Cheesecake

    Four websites I visit daily

    Four places I would rather be right now

    • Home, in bed
    • Cadbury World (mmm, Mini Eggs)
    • Disneyworld (why not?)
    • Somewhere warm, friendly, exciting…

    Four bloggers I am tagging

    • David
    • Tom
    • Claire (see if she’s paying attention)
    • Jennie (almost definitely isn’t paying attention)
    • anyone else? in the comments…

  4. Timeless

    January 22, 2006 by dafyd

    My watch has died.

    The screen wasn’t showing anything, so I took it to get a new battery. The battery and screen worked fine, but the button to change the time wouldn’t do anything… so I couldn’t set the time. Which kinda spoils the point of a watch.

    So I need a new one.

    Much as I love the idea of a watch showing the time in binary, I’m not sure quite how practical it is…

    So what is a good watch? A good brand? Important features? Any ideas?


  5. A Riddle

    January 20, 2006 by dafyd

    This was posted on the JCR website, by someone looking for the answer:

    One man has six of them, two men have 8.
    If women have them, they are halved.
    If children use them, they have 18.
    I have none, but you have several.
    They are red at day and black at night.

    I have no idea – and it’s going to keep bugging me now. Anyone got any clue at all…?


  6. Fantasmagorical

    January 17, 2006 by dafyd

    Chitty Chitty Bang BangTo Sunderland, on Saturday evening, to see the national tour of Chitty Chitty Bang Bang.

    When it premiered in the West End nearly four years ago, Chitty was the biggest musical ever produced. Apparently. I’m not sure quite how they define that – whether it be cast, effects, whatever… Certainly, I don’t doubt that this musical was jolly expensive to put on. Lucky, then, that the chappies doing it had all the money from the Bond films… yes, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang was originally written by Ian Fleming (I knew that) and made into a film by “Cubby” Broccolli (I didn’t know that). Broccolli’s daughter, the current producer of the Bond franchise, masterminded this show. Of course, any trivia buff worth his salt knows that Roald Dahl adapted the novel for the screen – and there is certainly an awful lot of his dark humour that shines through both to the film and on the stage.

    This tour (Sunderland is its first stop – it premiered on 9 December 2005 there) may not be quite as huge as the West End production. It doesn’t have Michael Ball, Jason Donovan, Alvin Stardust, Brian Blessed, Richard O’Brien… But it does have a huge presence. It most certainly makes itself known.

    From the opening bars of the Overture, the audience was enthralled. Who doesn’t know the title song with its catchy, bouncy melodies, and who could resist clapping along to it as the house lights dim?

    The sets appear to have been brought intact from the Palladium – huge, gloriously colourful backdrops, wonderfully Heath Robinson-esque inventions – serving not to recreate the look of the film on stage, but to spark one’s imagination. Adrian Noble’s direction makes full use of the stage, with some big set-piece dances (although, it must be said, some work considerably better than others).

    The music is… well, everyone knows the music. The Sherman Brothers wrote Chitty Chitty Bang Bang while at the height of their powers – this was the era of The Jungle Book and Mary Poppins – and, unlike Mary Poppins, they were enticed back to provide additional pieces for the stage production. The new songs do work very well – certainly better than “Temper, Temper”, for example, in Mary Poppins – some of them you would almost swear were in the film.

    The cast is definitely very competent but, I would argue, nothing particularly special. The adult leads seemed to play them very much as a starched Rex Harrison and Julie Andrews (heh, mixing my musicals here…), with the prim and proper accents sounding a little strained from time to time. The supporting adults – Baron and Baroness Bombast, Grandpa Potts, Boris and Goran – are all played for their comic value. Which worked. Boris and Goran have a fabulous little number in the middle of the first act – “Think Vulgar!” – in which they contemplate what makes them Vulgar and not English. They then reappear from time to time to tie the plot together and provide more laughs as hapless spies.

    Robin Askwith doesn’t have much room to play with the Childcatcher role. It was created in the West End by Richard O’Brien, and is buried under latex, leather and make-up. It’s probably the equivalent of Pharoah in Joseph – everyone knows what to expect and what they want to see, and that’s what he must give. That said, he is perfectly adequately evil…!

    Nothing huge acting-wise is demanded of the children. They don’t have any big solo numbers à la Whistle Down The Wind or Annie, but they do get to spend a lot of time looking wide-eyed and cute. That is not to say, though, that they don’t do a good job… they do exactly what is demanded of them, and do it very, very well. Actually, they get to fly, too – floating out of bed and off stage. Bit of a surprise, that – but jolly good!

    But who cares about the real people? The star of the show is, undoubtedly, the car. I suppose it says something about the state of theatre when a prop gets a louder round of applause than any of the actors – but that’s kinda the point. You’re coming to see a flying car so when, at the end of the first act, she finally does fly, it had better be good. And it is. Very, very good. The car transforms – think Optimus Prime preparing for battle – wheels fold up, wings unfold… and then the car really does fly around the stage. Sitting where we were right at the top of the theatre, we couldn’t see underneath terribly well, so I can’t say how the effect works if you’re sitting in the stalls, but it does look stunning. The car had already turned into a hovercraft – cushion inflating from underneath it and moving around the stage – and this was even better. I confess to being a leeetle bit disappointed that there was no flying over the stalls, as in the West End / Broadway productions… but this was damn good anyway.

    Certain other people have suggested that the show has too much of a panto flavour to it, appealing to little kids who can boo the bad guys and “aah” at the cuddly dogs (yes, there are real, life dogs on stage)… which is exactly the point. This is not Mary Poppins, with its very dark moments. It’s a light frolic through a few warped imaginations (I mean, what’s wrong with Ian Fleming? Truly Scrumptious? That’s even worse than Pussy Galore, for crying out loud.) that is probably many kids’ first experience of musical theatre (I doubt many will have been terribly impressed by Miss Saigon…).

    Technically, this show is fantastic. Musically, wonderful – you will find yourself getting stuck in the lyrics. Under the surface – maybe not so much. But does it matter? No. This is Fun with a capital F, and that’s all it needs to be to be the huge hit that it is. See it!

    Wow – a 1000-word theatre review. I’m impressed with myself. Makes up for the lack of posting recently, I suppose. I’ll do better from now on, promise!


  7. The Grauniad does time travel

    January 12, 2006 by dafyd

    From the Corrections and Clarifications in Wednesday’s Grauniad:

    We said in error that the rap artist 50 Cent is billed to appear in a Sunderland pub on February 29 (People, page 16, January 6). Neither the performance nor the date will take place. The next leap year is 2008.

    Brilliant.

    [via]


  8. Blend in with the crowd

    January 5, 2006 by dafyd

    We went to the Nottingham Playhouse pantomime on Monday – Jack and the Beanstalk, not one of their best, but a good time anyway.

    We were sitting in seats L31-35, at the very end of one of the rows in the stalls.

    Sitting at the far left of the stalls, in fact.

    “Ah, blend in with the crowd,” says JJ, as we’re making our way there.

    OK, that doesn’t really make much sense, but I’ll nod and agree with him anyway. No doubt he’s making some clever joke that went straight over my head (I was tired – I’d been working all day – on a Bank Holiday, too).

    Waiting for the panto to start, I sit there mulling over my ickle brother’s cryptic comment. What does sitting at the far left have to do with blending into the crowd? There wasn’t anything particularly special about the people sitting around us.

    Thinks. Far left. Heh, there’s a joke about Communism there. Something about Lenin, maybe.

    D’oh.

    “Lenin would be proud”, not “blend in with the crowd”.

    I need to get my hearing checked.

    And why is JJ making my jokes 5 minutes before I do? Hmmph.


  9. Big Cats and Big Monkeys

    January 3, 2006 by dafyd

    Potentially spoilers in here, but tough

    The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the WardrobeThe Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe

    Wow. I really enjoyed Narnia. I was, of course, a little worried that they would ruin it – but they really did do an admirable job of transferring the book to the screen.

    The CGI was perfect – not overly obvious, showing off, but it just sat there in the background, doing what it was supposed to do – bring characters to life.

    The four Pevensie children were very, very good – and, unlike the Harry Potter lot, these kids can actually act! Liam Neeson payed, well, himself as Aslan – very much the character he was in Star Wars, Batman Begins, Kingdom of Heaven… but he did do it very well!

    The beavers – Ray Winstone and Dawn French – also did a fantastic job. They were, of course, helped somewhat by the CGI, but they really did sound as I imagined. James McAvoy was a very good Mr Tumnus, and Tilda Swinton as the White Witch was positively insidiously evil. Brilliant.

    So – roll on Prince Caspian!

    King KongKing Kong

    Superb. Stunning.

    If you haven’t already, you must see Peter Jackson’s loving remake of King Kong.

    Yes, it’s a remake. Yes, it is almost exactly the same as the classic 1933 version. But this film is so beautiful that it doesn’t matter that the story has been told several times before. Rather, that’s the whole point.

    If I thought the CGI in Narnia was good, in Kong it’s superb. The giant ape (played, like Gollum, by Andy Serkis, then rendered by computer) looks incredibly real. 1930s New York looks like you could reach out and touch it. And the whole vision of the movie – almost an homage to early Hollywood action flicks – is truly beautiful.

    Acting – well, Kong himself is fantastic. Naomi Watts takes the Fay Wray role brilliantly, with Adrien Brody, Thomas Kretschmann, Colin Hanks and Jamie Bell providing excellent support. Jack Black as Carl Denham certainly shows another side to his on-screen persona (a long, long way from School of Rock), but somehow he doesn’t quite convince.

    The only real criticism I have is that the film is too long. Three hours is pushing it. OK, Jackson may be getting used to long films, but some scenes in Kong really did seem superfluous – three dinosaur chases is too many, and the bugs scene is not only laughable, but completely unnecessary.

    Nothing’s perfect. But you’ll have to wait a while to see anything like this!